Skip to main content

2025: ASCILITE 2025 Conference Proceedings

The Proceedings of the 2025 ASCILITE Conference

S. Barker, S. Kelly, R. McInnes & S. Dinmore. (Eds.). Future-focused: Educating in an era of continuous change. Proceedings ASCILITE 2025. Adelaide. Adelaide Convention Centre, Adelaide, Australia. November 30 - December 3 2025. https://eventstudio.eventsair.com/ascilite-2025

Published: 28 November 2025

Full Issue

ASCILITE Conference - Concise Papers

  • Beyond English-only: Towards multilingual instruction with machine translation

    Anika Harju, Camille Dickson-Deane, Amara Atif

    Australian universities face a critical disconnect between the predominance of monolingual instruction and the multilingual realities of the student population at the tertiary level. With one-fifth of the Australian population speaking a language other than English, existing educational paradigms often fail to foster inclusive learning environments that reflect this linguistic diversity present in the student population. The gap necessitates a fundamental shift in language instruction, which must challenge monolingual conventions and accommodate students from more diverse linguistic backgrounds. While generic translation tools are widely available, they frequently produce fragmented or inaccurate outputs, especially when applied to complex academic content. In the absence of a clear national language policy, this concise paper argues that fine-tuned artificial neural networks used in machine translation, when trained on annotated parallel data, can bridge the equity language instruction gap and facilitate the implementation of multilingual instruction as part of a transformative shift led by educators to ensure no student is left behind.

  • Equity in action: Leveraging cross-faculty collaboration towards inclusive teaching practices

    Dana Bui, Helmy Cook, Aster Cosmos, Prudence Perry, Elizabeth McCarthy

    This paper presents the creation of 'implementables': ready-to-implement teaching resources designed to nudge educators towards more inclusive approaches. It addresses the challenge of translating EDI theory into practice. Drawing on frameworks such as CDIO (Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate) and Advance HE’s EDI curriculum standards, our group mapped connections between effective learning design and inclusive pedagogical practices. This work highlights the significant overlap between principles of good pedagogy and inclusive teaching practice, and resulted in a resource, Equity in Action, consolidating practical, actionable examples and stretch goals for educators. The work underscores the importance of practical support for educators at varying levels of EDI expertise and advocates for ongoing, community-driven efforts to foster sustainable, meaningful change in higher education environments.

  • LIFT as leadership practice: Cultivating identity, influence, and belonging for women in the third space

    Simone Tyrell, Karine Cosgrove, Helmy Cook, Kranthi Addanki, Leanne Ngo

    In an era of rapid institutional and digital transformation, navigating leadership in higher education’s third space presents complex identity challenges, particularly for women. Through an interactive autoethnographic process, five participants in the ASCILITE Community Mentoring Program for Women in Leadership (CMP-WiPL) explored these challenges over 18 months, combining personal reflection, peer dialogue, and professional identity practice. Through iterative cycles of self-assessment, professional identity building on LinkedIn, and collaborative discussions within our WiPL Community of Practice (CoP), the group created and refined the Leadership Identity Framework for Transformation (LIFT). Informed by theoretical models of professional identity, third space capabilities, and Communities of Practice, LIFT offers a practical and adaptable approach to scaffold identity development, address imposter syndrome, and fosters inclusive leadership. Findings highlight the power of collective sense-making, digital tools, and structured reflection in supporting professional growth. By framing leadership as a continuous reflective journey, this work provides a sustainable model for enabling confident, authentic leadership in higher education and the third space sectors shaped by uncertainty and change.

  • Grounded theory and reflection: Reflecting about online teaching

    Karen Williams

    This paper tells the story of how I came to use constructivist grounded theory (CGT) as a method to facilitate my own reflection. As an online teacher, the speed at which things happen, the constant turnover and sheer number of decisions made across courses meant that most of my decisions were the result of reflection-in-action rather than reflection-on-action. Whilst existing reflective models provided some insight, for me what they were lacking was a robust, established, research-oriented framework, and an overall outcome I could conceptualise, share and communicate. After telling the story of how I came to use CGT, I provide a brief overview of the various process in CGT, a brief rationale for how these link to, or enable reflection, how they were used, and my thoughts on the overall process. The paper concludes with some final thoughts and actions for moving forward.

  • Smart scaffolds, smarter learners? Analysing the cognitive outcomes of AR and chatbot feedback

    Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun, Even Yi-Wen Liu, Jocelyn Ting-Yu Shen

    This study investigated the impact of chatbot and AR-based feedback scaffolding on university students’ cognitive load during a scientific simulation inquiry. In a randomized experiment, 118 university students received feedback from one of four scaffolding conditions: traditional, chatbot, augmented reality (AR), or a combined chatbot-AR system. Cognitive load was assessed using a validated self-report scale, complemented with an open-ended questionnaire. Results indicated that chatbot scaffolding significantly increased intrinsic load, and the combined chatbot–AR scaffolding group showed significantly higher extraneous load than the AR-based group. These findings suggest that integrating multiple forms of scaffolding may elevate cognitive burden and should be implemented with caution to prevent excessive load on learners.

  • Transform: Building creative capacity and psychological safety for innovation in higher education through professional learning

    Amelia Di Paolo, Glendon Gardner, Kevin Millingham

    This paper reports on the Innovation Lab: Transform, a six-month professional development program in the Learning Design and Technology unit at the University of Technology Sydney. Designed during a period of rapid change (generative AI, assessment security), the program created a structured, in-person space for experimentation through Creative Foundations workshops and a team-based Idea Accelerator. Co-created values and distributed facilitation helped establish psychological safety, while feedback showed gains in creative confidence, collaboration, and willingness to test bold ideas. The success of the Transform program has since anchored a broader innovation agenda framed around three streams: Optimise (incremental improvements), Extend (modular innovation), and Transform (capability-building for radical change). This paper demonstrates how a single localised initiative can evolve into a multi-layered strategy, balancing day-to-day enhancement with capacity for systemic innovation. Insights are offered for third space professionals and leaders seeking to embed sustainable innovation in higher education.

  • Bridging design and practice: Teacher and learning designer perceptions on cognitive engagement in online learning

    Polly K. Lai, Dhiaan Sidhu

    This study investigates university teachers’ and learning designers’ perceptions of students’ cognitive engagement in online learning. Using qualitative data, five key behavioural indicators were identified: active participation, application of knowledge, preparation, collaboration, and high-quality contributions. Teachers emphasised real-time engagement through digital tools and classroom interactions, while learning designers highlighted the role of instructional scaffolding and teacher preparedness in supporting deeper learning. Collaborative learning was a shared focus, with peer interaction seen as a driver of critical thinking and reflection. A notable divergence in emphasis emerged: teachers prioritised observable behaviours, whereas designers focused on pedagogical design. This suggests a need for better alignment between teaching practice and instructional design to enhance engagement. The findings highlight the interplay between student agency and structured learning environments, offering insights into optimising online education for sustained cognitive effort and meaningful learning.

  • Finding voice and validity: Interactive oral assessment in graduate teacher education

    Desmond Chia Chun Tan

    In response to the challenges of academic integrity and the rise of generative AI in higher education, this study explores how Interactive Oral Assessment (IOA) can be used alongside traditional written assessments to better evaluate a capstone action research project in graduate teacher education. The study was conducted in the Master of Teaching program at Universiti Brunei Darussalam, where student teachers complete a 12,000-word Research Exercise in their final semester. Conducted in three phases, the study involved two pilot stages to refine the assessment design and support structures, followed by full implementation. This study presents preliminary findings from Phase 3 (full implementation) and survey data from Phase 2 (formative IOA pilot). Across both phases, student teachers reported that the IOA process was engaging and authentic, providing enhanced opportunities for critical reflection and meaningful communication. Initial insights suggest that IOA not only supports student voice but also strengthens the validity of assessment through its alignment with real-world teaching competencies. While further analysis is ongoing, these early results highlight IOA’s potential as an authentic, responsive, and future-focused assessment strategy in teacher preparation.

  • Secure online assessments: Strategies to mitigate generative AI risks in higher education

    Joane Jonathan, Chris Walsh

    The rapid rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools has intensified universities’ long-standing challenge of ensuring that student work is authentic, an issue that is particularly acute in fully online programs. In 2024, new Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) guidelines prompted our university to revise its Assessment for Learning Policy and Procedures, requiring every unit to have a secure assessment that is explicitly mapped to learning outcomes and validates core knowledge and skills. This study reports on the first pilot of that policy in three wholly online, postgraduate units. Using the 4-A Framework for secure assessment design, we implemented remotely-invigilated final exams in two units and a live, oral presentation in the third. Semi-structured interviews are planned with academics and students, and completion data and incident reports will be analysed. Preliminary pilot findings indicate that secure tasks can credibly validate student ownership of learning outcomes in an online environment. While both formats reduced academic-integrity breaches, oral presentations garnered higher perceptions of authenticity and lower than expected administrative overheads. We argue that secure, outcome-mapped assessments are feasible, scalable, and pedagogically valuable in online postgraduate education, and we outline policy and practice implications for institutions facing similar regulatory pressures.

  • Reflect-revise-reveal: A learning journal journey in experiential education

    Olga Sudareva, David Ratliff

    Bridging the knowing–doing gap remains a formidable challenge in large foundational higher education courses. This study examines the integration of structured reflective learning journals, grounded in experiential learning theory, within a first-year economics curriculum to foster metacognition, student engagement, and authentic knowledge transfer. Weekly guided prompts invited learners to connect course content with personal insights and real-world applications, while a peer review intervention was later introduced to scaffold evaluative judgement and deepen reflective practices. Across three semesters, consistently high participation and improved performance outcomes were observed, particularly with the inclusion of peer review, suggesting that reflective writing supported by peer review cultivates meaningful engagement and enhances critical thinking. This paper highlights reflective practice and peer review as a potential catalyst for meaning-making and learner growth in contemporary higher education.

  • Designing AI-enhanced learning environments for adult learners: A design-based framework for solving complex interdisciplinary problems

    Haopeng Teng, Thomas Cochrane, Mat Hardy

    As online adult education rapidly expands, driven by technological advancements and post-pandemic demands, there is a critical need to reimagine evaluation and learning frameworks that address the limitations of traditional methods. This study proposes a novel Design-Based Research (DBR) framework to develop AI-enhanced learning environments tailored for solving complex, real-world problems. By integrating heutagogy, authentic learning, and transformative learning theory, the research aims to create a transferable model that empowers adult learners to navigate interdisciplinary challenges. Expected outcomes include a transferable design framework, ethical AI guidelines, and scalable principles for lifelong learning, addressing gaps in traditional evaluation methods while prioritizing learner-centric and context-sensitive innovation.

  • Empowering women to code: Playful learning with Karel

    Stephen Tierney, Alison Wong

    Programming skills are essential across STEM and data-intensive fields, yet many students, particularly women, experience anxiety and lack confidence in their coding abilities. To address these issues, we developed an extracurricular coding challenge using Karel the Robot for undergraduate and postgraduate business students enrolled in introductory data science units. We conducted a mixed-methods study to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. Participants who engaged with the challenge reported an increase in positive sentiment towards programming and confidence. Notably, women exhibited larger gains in confidence than men, despite facing the stereotype about gendered ability. These findings indicate that playful and low-stakes environments can empower underrepresented learners.

  • “It’s more than a checklist”: Co-designing accessibility with staff and students with visual impairment

    Linh Nguyen, Quyen Tran, Giang Le

    This paper reflects on a co-design initiative with students with visual impairment to improve accessibility in a Canvas-based learning environment at an Australian-owned university in Vietnam. The project shifted practice from reactive compliance with WCAG standards to a more relational, proactive approach—embedding user feedback during the design phase. Situated within a broader context of limited inclusion in Vietnamese higher education, the paper argues that technical standards alone cannot ensure meaningful accessibility. Co-design fostered practical improvements and prompted mindset shifts among learning designers. Cultural values such as trust and collaboration further supported the process. The paper concludes by identifying implications for institutions in similar contexts and future applications for supporting neurodivergent learners through co-design.

Showing 40–52 of 86 articles