Skip to main content

2025: ASCILITE 2025 Conference Proceedings

The Proceedings of the 2025 ASCILITE Conference

S. Barker, S. Kelly, R. McInnes & S. Dinmore. (Eds.). Future-focused: Educating in an era of continuous change. Proceedings ASCILITE 2025. Adelaide. Adelaide Convention Centre, Adelaide, Australia. November 30 - December 3 2025. https://eventstudio.eventsair.com/ascilite-2025

Published: 28 November 2025

Full Issue

ASCILITE Conference - Concise Papers

  • Enhancing self-regulated learning with large language models: A pilot study on the feasibility of local deployment

    Xiaoyu Zhuang, Aneesha Bakharia

    Self-regulated learning (SRL) is essential for academic success, yet many learners struggle to plan, monitor, and reflect their learning processes without support. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer opportunities for real-time, personalised learning guidance, but cloud-based deployments raise privacy and trust concerns. This pilot study investigates the feasibility of delivering SRL support through a locally deployed, privacy-preserving chatbot. Using a design-based research approach, we co-designed a chatbot platform with sixty-one university students and conducted a two-week field study with seven participants using both local (offline) and cloud-based (online) modes. Mixed-method findings indicate that the chatbot successfully prompted higher-order SRL activities such as goal setting and reflective monitoring in authentic study sessions. Participants reported greater trust when using the fully local LLMs due to data remaining on-device. However, the local LLMs demonstrated much slower response times and occasional inaccuracies, highlighting privacy-performance trade-offs. This research demonstrates the potential of locally deployed, privacy-preserving, human-centred AI to support SRL and offers empirical insights into the benefits and limitations of deploying LLMs on small-scale local devices in educational contexts.

  • Enhancing feedback literacy and engagement in project management education: A case study of feedback analytics

    Ee Hui Lim, Yi-Shan Tsai, Bhagya Maheshi, Sanaz Nikfalazar

    This paper investigates how students in different performance groups engage with and perceive feedback within a large postgraduate information technology project management unit at an Australian university. Using data from 228 students who voluntarily participated in a feedback analytics tool, named PolyFeed, the study examines patterns of feedback annotation, reflective note-taking, and action plan creation. The findings reveal that while feedback quality is consistently rated highly across all groups, lower-performing students participate less and are less likely to act on feedback. In contrast, higher-performing students demonstrate greater sense-making and proactive use of feedback. The study highlights the importance of designing feedback systems that scaffold all aspects of feedback literacy, particularly for students at risk of disengagement, to promote equitable and meaningful learning outcomes.

  • Mapping work-integrated learning gaps through Bloom’s Taxonomy: A multi-layer curriculum analysis in creative education

    Donna Cleveland, Long Nguyen, An Nguyen, Manny Ling, Thanh Nguyen

    Work-integrated learning (WIL) has become central to higher education reform, yet its implementation remains inconsistent across disciplines, with evaluation often limited to surface metrics rather than cognitive depth. This study explores how WIL is embedded within creative undergraduate programs of School of Communication & Design (SCD) at RMIT Vietnam – an international branch of a prestigious Australian university, responding to calls for greater curriculum-employability alignment in higher education. Drawing on transformative learning and authentic learning theories, and using Bloom’s revised taxonomy as an evaluative lens, this research systematically maps WIL integration across 153 courses in three curriculum layers—course learning outcomes (CLOs), assessments, and course materials. Quantitative analysis of action verbs and learning activities reveals that while WIL is moderately represented in CLOs and assessments, significant gaps exist in instructional delivery, particularly in early-year courses. The findings suggest a concentration of cognitively complex WIL in capstone experiences, with limited scaffolding earlier in programs. The study offers a replicable evaluative framework and advocates for intentional curriculum co-design involving educators and industry. This contribution informs pedagogical, institutional, and policy strategies to support more authentic, scaffolded, and equitable WIL integration.

  • Data to design: Simulating instructional strategies with agent-based modelling

    John Vulic, Michael J. Jacobson, James A. Levin

    What if we could simulate a learning environment like a living, evolving ecosystem? Our research views education as a complex adaptive system and applies methods from computational science to study it. We build agent-based models that simulate how learning happens in classrooms, drawing on both quantitative and qualitative data. These models allow us to run simulations that are updated with real classroom data over time. This helps us explore questions such as: “Which teaching methods best support student learning and knowledge transfer?” Our modelling suggests that Productive Failure may be especially effective in promoting deeper learning and transfer. We conclude by discussing how these insights highlight the potential of computational modelling in education research.

  • Just ask Mattie: Supporting first-year business maths students with a custom-built AI-tutor

    Malgorzata Korolkiewicz, Wolfgang Mayer, Nicholas Fewster-Young

    This paper presents preliminary findings from the development and deployment of Mattie, an AI-powered chatbot tutor designed to support first-year university students in a business mathematics course. Motivated by concerns about students’ reluctance to seek help, particularly in public forums where they fear appearing ‘stupid’ in front of peers or instructors, Mattie.AI was created to provide personalised and course-specific learning assistance on demand 24/7. Unlike general-purpose chatbots, Mattie.AI was built using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) architecture, allowing it to generate responses based on course-specific learning materials. The underlying chatbot design was Socratic, focused on helping students through guided questioning instead of simply providing answers. Evaluation of the first deployment combined chatbot interaction data with student feedback from a usability and satisfaction survey to provide insights into its functionality as well as patterns of student engagement. Results suggest that subject-specific chatbots offer a promising supplement to traditional support structures, but students need to be supported to use them effectively. Future work in this space of AI-enhanced education technologies will refine Mattie’s capabilities and explore its impact on learning outcomes and help-seeking behaviours across different student cohorts.

  • Exploring GenAI in assessment and feedback: Insights from postcards of practice

    Siobhan Wills, George Joukhadar, Michael Cowling, Pranit Anand, Kate Nicholls

    As Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) rapidly enters higher education, its implications for assessment and feedback require urgent, practice-informed exploration. This study investigates how educators at UNSW - a large Australian university - are engaging with GenAI in their teaching, drawing on data from the institution’s "Postcards of Practice" initiative; a short, reflective narratives of GenAI use in assessment contexts. Through a qualitative interpretive methodology, including thematic analysis of interviews and postcard content, the research explores educators’ experiences, comfort levels, perceived challenges, and support needs. Findings are expected to reveal diverse levels of GenAI adoption shaped by disciplinary context, ethical concerns, and usability perceptions. The study also anticipates a strong call for targeted professional development, institutional guidance, and customisable GenAI tools. This research foregrounds educators’ micro-level decision-making to contribute to the growing body of work on formative assessment, feedback literacy, and ethical AI integration. It positions GenAI not as a threat, but as an opportunity to reimagine assessment as a dialogic, developmental process.

  • Walking the talk: Co-designing a co-design approach

    Uyen Nguyen, Sasha Stubbs

    This paper examines challenges implementing co-design practices in a Vietnamese campus of an Australian University and presents a tailored professional development approach addressing foundational collaboration understandings within Vietnamese cultural contexts. After three years of operation, our learning design team faced persistent issues co-designing learning experiences with academics, revealing a fundamental misunderstanding of co-design principles within the team itself. Initial interventions failed because they employed didactic approaches that violated the collaborative principles they aimed to teach. Through practice-led research combining practitioner inquiry, collaborative auto-ethnography, and retrospective sensemaking, we identified two dysfunctional power dynamics: "power-for" relationships where learning designers acted as service providers, and "power-over" dynamics where designers dominated processes, rather than the "power-with" approach needed for true collaboration. Cultural factors, including Confucian values emphasising hierarchy and examination-oriented traditions, compounded these challenges. Our "Walking the Talk" intervention employed experiential role-playing activities, positioning learning designers as clients in interior design scenarios. This method successfully disrupted habitual practices, enabling participants to embody co-design principles rather than merely understanding them theoretically. Findings demonstrate that authentic collaboration requires deliberate cultivation in Vietnamese contexts, where social-political arrangements essential to co-design do not emerge organically. This research offers strategies for developing collaborative capabilities in hierarchical cultural contexts.

  • Building capacity for AI-powered learning: A collaborative trial of conversational agents in higher education

    Antony Tibbs

    Generative AI-powered conversational agents represent new opportunities for personalised learning in higher education, but institutional adoption requires careful support and professional development. This paper presents a case study of a collaborative trial involving twenty-six university staff who created and tested learning agents using the Cogniti platform over six months in 2024. Participants developed twenty agents across multiple disciplines, with nine successfully deployed to teaching practice. Survey results showed exceptional satisfaction rates, with all participants rating the platform as easy to use and 95% willing to recommend it to colleagues. Qualitative analysis identified benefits including scalable personalised feedback, enhanced student engagement, and flexible learning scenarios that would otherwise require significant staff time and resources. Participants emphasised that success depends heavily on developing prompting skills and understanding AI limitations. Critical success factors included expert support from learning designers acting as 'critical friends' and opportunities for interdisciplinary learning. Results suggest that well-designed collaborative trials can overcome barriers to AI adoption in higher education by providing necessary training, support, and community while ensuring pedagogically sound implementation that maintains quality learning experiences.

Showing 79–86 of 86 articles