The temptation of the silver platter: Preventing the sidestep and normalising the productive struggle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70770/tbb3db47

Keywords:

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), , productive struggle, academic integrity, digital literacy, ChatGPT, assessment, assessment exemplars

Abstract

In an era characterised by rapid technological advancements, educational tools have become integral to academic success. Tools such as Grammarly, Studiosity, assessment exemplars, and more recently, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) technologies like ChatGPT, offer students unprecedented support. This paper considers the critical role of the productive struggle as part of the journey to meta-learning and meta-cognition and emphasises the risk of educational tools in sidestepping this crucial process. To explore how educators can support students in achieving learning success when tempted by product-oriented educational tools, this paper presents the Responsible Use of Educational Tools Thinking Framework which offers a pragmatic approach for assisting educators and students in applying critical thinking when integrating educational tools into the assessment process. This proposed framework, complemented by a teaching model, serves as a guide to help students navigate their path and use critical thinking while using educational tools. To further support this thinking framework, this conceptual paper presents three key practices essential for embedding educational tools into the learning journey. First, students must purposefully engage with educational tools to develop technological competence. Second, they must exercise critical thinking and judgment during the productive struggle of idea generation, and third, students must employ ethical decision-making to ensure the responsible and morally conscious use of these tools. Aligned with the imperative of cultivating technological competence, exercising critical thinking amidst the productive struggle, and instilling ethical decision-making, the framework functions as a practical solution to ensure that students not only acquire knowledge through the assessment process, but also cultivate essential skills for critical thinking and managing educational success.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Trixie James, CQUniversity

    Trixie James is a lecturer within the STEPS enabling program at CQUniversity and completed her PhD through the University of Tasmania. She is also accredited with a Masters of Learning Management (Executive Leadership), Graduate Diploma of Learning Management and a Bachelor of Learning Management as well as certification on Positive Psychology.  Trixie’s research interests centre on the support and engagement of under-represented and disadvantaged adults in the tertiary sector through sharing advancements in quality teaching practices and ways to further engage students within the enabling arena and how positive psychology can improve students’ wellbeing. Trixie is highly active in research and is a member of the Centre for Research in Equity and Advancement of Teaching and Education (CREATE), is an executive member of the National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia (NAEEA) and leads the Social Innovation working party within the School of Access Education, and co-leads the NAEEA Special Interest Group into Generative Artificial Intelligence.

References

Ainley, J., Schulz, W., & Fraillon, J. (2016). A Global measure of digital and ICT literacy skills. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245577

Attorney-General’s Portfolio. (2024). New criminal laws to combat sexually explicit deepfakes. https://ministers.ag.gov.au/media-centre/new-criminal-laws-combat-sexually-explicit-deepfakes-05-06-2024

Australian Government. (2021a). State of Australia’s skills 2021: Now and into the future. https://www.nationalskillscommission.gov.au/reports/state-of-australia-skills-2021

Australian Government. (2021b). Inquiry into social media and online safety. https://www.esafety.gov.au/sites/default/files/2023-04/eSafety-submission-Inquiry-into-social-media-and-online-safety.pdf

Australian Qualifications Framework Council. (2013). Australian qualifications framework (2nd ed.). https://www.aqf.edu.au/download/405/aqf-second-edition/3/aqf-second-edition/pdf

Baker, K., Jessup, N. A., Jacobs, V. R., Empson, S. B., & Case, J. (2020). Productive struggle in action. Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12, 113(5), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTLT.2019.0060

Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Learning to work with the black box: Pedagogy for a world with artificial intelligence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1160–1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13337

Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative math, inspiring messages and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.

Boud, D., & Associates. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. https://www.uts.edu.au/sites/default/files/Assessment-2020_propositions_final.pdf

Bullmaster-Day, M. (2015). Productive struggle for deeper learning. https://www.academia.edu/22763598/Productive_Struggle_for_Deeper_Learning

Carter, R., Salamonson, Y., Ramjan, L. M., & Halcomb, E. (2018). Students use of exemplars to support academic writing in higher education: An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 65, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.02.038

CQUniversity. (2023). Graduate attributes. https://delivery-cqucontenthub.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/graduate-attributes.pdf

Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A. (2023). Leadership is needed for ethical ChatGPT: Character, assessment, and learning using artificial intelligence (AI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.3.02

Deng, Y., Cherian, J., Khan, N. U. N., Kumari, K., Sial, M. S., Comite, U., Gavurova, B., & Popp, J. (2022). Family and academic stress and their impact on students’ depression level and academic performance. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 869337. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.869337

Eke, D. O. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of generative AI: Threat to academic integrity? Journal of Responsible Technology, 13, 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060

Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024). The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools. Studies in Higher Education, 49(5), 865–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881

Feibleman, J. K. (1967). The philosophy of tools. Social Forces, 45(3), 329. https://doi.org/10.2307/2575191

Fitria, T. N. (2021). Grammarly as AI-powered English writing assistant: Students’ alternative for writing English. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 5(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v5i1.3519

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). Ai4people—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Grainger, P., Purnell, K., & Zipf, R. (2008). Judging quality through substantive conversations between markers. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 133–142.

González-Doğan, S., Foulger, T. S., & King, A. M. (2024). Integrating principled innovation as a character development framework in education coursework. Journal of Moral Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2024.2361055

Harrington, N. (2005). It’s too difficult! Frustration intolerance beliefs and procrastination. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(5), 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.12.018

Hawe, E., Dixon, H., & Hamilton, R. (2021). Why and how educators use exemplars. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 18(3), 136–149. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.18.3.10

Hu, J., & Yu, W. (2023). What are ESL students’ academic integrity challenges and how can universities help? International Journal of TESOL Studies, 5(3), 64–78.

James, T., & Andrews, G. (2024). Levelling the Playing Field Through GenAI: Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Bridge Educational Gaps for Equity and Disadvantaged Students. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.5456/WPLL.26.3.250

James, T., Griffin, H., Johnston, K., & Armstrong, F. (2023). Reflective minds, brighter futures: Empowering critical reflection with a guided instructional model. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.6.9

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.17268566

Koltovskaia, S. (2020). Student engagement with automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) provided by Grammarly: A multiple case study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100450

Laal, M. (2013). Lifelong learning and technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 980–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.182

Lockey, S., Gillespie, N., & Curtis, C. (2020). Trust in artificial intelligence: Australian insights. The University of Queensland and KPMG. https://doi.org/10.14264/b32f129

Lucas, B. (2019). Why we need to stop talking about twenty-first century skills. Seminar Series 283. Centre for Strategic Education. https://all-learning.org.au/app/uploads/2021/11/Seminar-Series-283-May2019.pdf

Lynch, J., Orsino, A., & Kawamura, A. (2022). Productive struggle and failing safely: Implications for developing adaptive expertise in communication. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 27(5), 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-022-10175-x

McKinsey & Company. (2021). The future of work after COVID-19. Retrieved from mckinsey.com.

McLeod, A., & Richardson, H. (2023). Co-constructing skills for ChatGPT at university. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 17(1), T70–T80.

Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). ChatGPT for educational-academic activities: Preschool student teachers' experiences, Intelligent Technologies in Education, Advanced Online Publication.

Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S. (2024). Editorial: Enhancing student engagement through artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the basics, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(06). https://doi.org/10.53761/caraaq92

Pike, D., & Aruna, I. (2022). Implementing a study support service (studiosity) software system to improve students’ academic writing skills—What are the initial lessons we have learned, and where will we go next? 6337–6345. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.1613

PwC. (2021). Future of Work and Skills. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from mckinsey.com

Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority [QCAA]. (2017). 21st century skills for senior curriculum: A position paper. Queensland Government.

Reinhardt, N., Trnka, L.-M., & Reinhard, M.-A. (2023). The correlation of honesty-humility and learning goals with academic cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 26(1), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09742-2

Rodrigues, A. L., Cerdeira, L., Machado-Taylor, M. de L., & Alves, H. (2021). Technological skills in higher education—Different needs and different uses. Education Sciences, 11(7), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070326

Roe, J., Perkins, M., & Ruelle, D. (2024). Understanding student and academic staff perceptions of AI use in assessment and feedback, Intelligent Technologies in Education. Advanced Online Publication.

Susilowati, N., Kusmuriyanto, K., & Abiprayu, K. B. (2021). Encouraging student ethical behavior through ethical climate in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i2.19271

Techawitthayachinda, I. R., Deng, Y., Zeng, Z., Liu, H., Chen, Y.-C., & Huang, D. (2022). An AI-enable knowledge graph and student’s agency in productive struggle during problem-based learning in cybersecurity education. 441–449. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2189-1036.2022.40

Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency Act 2011 [TEQSA], (2011). https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2022C00328

To, J., Panadero, E., & Carless, D. (2022). A systematic review of the educational uses and effects of exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(8), 1167–1182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2011134

University of Queensland. (2023). UQ graduate statement and graduate attributes—Policy. https://ppl.app.uq.edu.au/content/3.10.05-graduate-attributes#Policy

World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision for education: Unlocking the potential of technology, World Economic Forum, Geneva.

UNESCO. (2015). A Global measure of digital and ICT literacy skills. Retrieved from unesdoc.unesco.org.

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542

Downloads

Published

2025-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles