Editorial: Improving quantitative research in higher education learning and teaching

Authors

  • Louise Taylor Oxford Brookes University, United Kingdom
  • Hai Min Dai Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
  • Hilary Ng Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong SAR, China
  • David Playfoot Swansea University, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Rose University of Staffordshire, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53761/jc59jm21

Keywords:

Quantitative research , Scholarship of Learning and Teaching, Educational research, Research Design, Research Impact

Abstract

Empirical research in higher education learning and teaching is vital if we are to enhance our understanding of how to improve students’ experiences and outcomes. Historically, however, this research has received less attention, recognition, and investment compared to discipline-specific research. Consequently, the field has suffered from a lack of methodological quality. In this Editorial, we consider common methodological problems in this research in view of international standards for quality research. Focusing on quantitative methods, we offer guidance to educators for developing rigorous higher education research, using a psychological science lens. We structure our discussion around three Principles for conducting theoretically-driven and systematic research, using tools that can increase the reliability, validity, and subsequent impact of research. Principle 1 = Theorise well, Principle 2 = Prioritise method robustness, and Principle 3 = Analyse, do not merely describe. Ultimately, our aim is to support educators to conduct robust research for improving higher education learning and teaching, and facilitate the dissemination of impactful findings by sharing them with others at scale in educational journals.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

Data Availability Statement

na

How to Cite

Editorial: Improving quantitative research in higher education learning and teaching. (2025). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/jc59jm21