Global challenges: South African and Australian students’ experiences of emergency remote teaching

Authors

  • Michelle Joubert University of the Free State, South Africa
  • Ana Larsen Central Queensland University, Australia
  • Bryce Magnuson Federation University, Australia
  • David Waldron Federation University, Australia
  • Ellen Sabo Federation University, Australia
  • Anna Fletcher Federation University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.4.09

Keywords:

Digital literacy, Online instruction during crisis, Engagement, Student Experience

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced universities worldwide to move their teaching online within an unprecedentedly short timeframe. Whilst the move online learning has increased the reach of tertiary educational delivery it has also raised significant issues of equity, accessibility and student engagement. This includes concerns around access to technology and reliable internet connectivity, academic and digital literacy, and other factors such as mental health and work-life balance. This paper examines two studies of student engagement with online learning during 2020 when then pandemic began. One study was conducted in South Africa the other in a small regional university in South-Eastern Australia. A mixed method approach was used in both studies and then student responses were analysed using the student engagement framework presented by Kahu and Nelson (2018). A key focus in this analysis is the critical importance the educational interface and shared mutually formative experience of learning between students and universities. Findings show that despite the two different contexts, student concerns around digital literacy and engagement in an online learning environment share many similarities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Global challenges: South African and Australian students’ experiences of emergency remote teaching. (2023). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.4.09