Immersive learning in a block teaching model: A case study of academic reform through principles, policies and practice

Authors

  • Thomas Roche Southern Cross University, Australia
  • Erica Wilson Southern Cross University, Australia
  • Elizabeth Goode Southern Cross University, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53761/1.21.2.12

Keywords:

student retention, active learning, immersive scheduling, block model, curriculum reform

Abstract

Universities across the globe are considering how to effect meaningful change in their higher education (HE) delivery in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic and shifting student learning preferences. This paper reports on a descriptive case- study of whole-of-institution curriculum reform at one regional Australian university, where more traditional 13-week semesters have been replaced with a 6-week immersive block model known as the Southern Cross Model. Based on a synthesis of literature in best practice HE pedagogy and principles, the case study draws on both a review of policy and staff interviews (N = 5) to outline the key changes necessary for successful HE transformation. Analysis revealed themes related to the vital roles of leadership, capacity building, monitoring the transition, staff adoption, and adequate technical systems in implementing a radical, multifaceted institutional transformation. Implications for practice at institutions considering reforming their curriculum model are also discussed. The findings from this case study indicate that an institutional transformation to an immersive block model requires both a considered change in institutional policy and process, as well as the appropriate resourcing of roles, governance committees, technical solutions, and, importantly, communities of practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-15

How to Cite

Immersive learning in a block teaching model: A case study of academic reform through principles, policies and practice. (2024). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.21.2.12