Research skill development spanning higher education: Critiques, curricula and connections

Authors

  • John W Willison University of Adelaide

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.4.1

Keywords:

Research Skill Development, student autonomy, teacher autonomy, sophisticated thinking, Models of Engaged Learning and Teaching, collaborative partnerships, connecting curricula, cognitive and affective

Abstract

The Research Skill Development (RSD) framework was devised in 2006 to articulate what educators do when they facilitate student learning through active exploration in ways that enable their skills to grow in sophistication and rigour. This special issue of JUTLP comprises eight articles that focus on the critique, adaptation and application of the RSD. This article introduces the special issue and presents the 2018 version of the RSD, in response to 12 years of feedback on the framework. Changes in the RSD include improvements in articulation of the facets of research, better delineation of autonomy, and the addition of the affective domain and guiding questions. Of the other seven articles, five are set in the undergraduate years and two in master’s, with contexts including biology, education, engineering, humanities and interdisciplinary studies. The articles are based across diverse settings, including laboratory, online, language and workplace learning. Of these seven, one critiques the RSD, three focus on curriculum design and three connect the RSD to enduring issues of current concern by adapting the framework for academic literacy, work skills and problem solving. These three adaptations are examples of numerous emerging models that modify RSD terminology and shape, within its broad parameters, and are introduced in this issue as the Models of Engaged Learning and Teaching (MELT).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Research skill development spanning higher education: Critiques, curricula and connections. (2018). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.15.4.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)